The Collection (shot in Atlanta) was a sponsor of the Buried Alive Film Fest
this year. In fact, one of the festival
organizers worked on the flick.
Coincidentally, the trailer for The Collection was shown before each
block of programming. I have a hunch
that these facts may be related. During
a smoke break in the indie goodness, the question “why the hell would anyone
release a major horror movie at the end of November” was brought up. With a few notable exceptions, November
isn’t known for its horror releases.
During that conversation, however, it occurred to me that this is the
PERFECT time for a movie like The Collection.
Think about it. Everyone just
had to deal with their families at Thanksgiving. Everyone is about to have to deal with their families again at
Christmas. What evokes more homicidal
rage than a family get together? Damn
near nothing, that’s what! With so many
people fantasizing about slaying the in-laws, a little vicarious wholesale
slaughter just might be what the family therapist ordered. The question is…is it any good?
Synopsis: When Elena is talked into attending an underground warehouse
party with her friends, she finds herself caught in a nightmarish trap where
the revelers are mowed, sliced and crushed to death by a macabre series of
contraptions operated by a masked psychopath. When the grisly massacre is over,
Elena is the only survivor. But before she can escape, she is locked in a trunk
and transported to an unknown location.
Fortunately for Elena, one man - Arkin - knows exactly where she’s
headed, having just escaped from there with his life and sanity barely intact.
Going back is the last thing on Arkin’s mind, but Elena’s wealthy father hires
a crack team of mercenaries to force Arkin to lead them to the killer’s lair.
But even these hardened warriors are not prepared for what they encounter: an
abandoned hotel-turned-torture-chamber, rigged with deadly traps and filled
with mangled corpses. Can Arkin and the team get to Elena before she too
becomes part of his gruesome "collection"?
The star of this film, and its biggest strength, is the
hotel that serves as The Collector’s lair.
This place is a masterpiece.
It’s HH Holmes’ (or Triple H as his friends knew him) deepest, darkest,
sickest, wettest dream. All the credit
in the world goes to everyone involved in its creation, from the production
designer to the set dressers to the art department. I loved how it didn’t have a single motif that dominated the
expansive compound. Almost every room
had a different look; some clinical, some decrepit, some dungeon like, some
almost beautiful, and all depraved.
It’s part Suspiria dance academy, part Hostel torture palace, part Home
Alone obstacle course gone horribly wrong, part Texas Chainsaw Massacre style gallery of WTF, and
part deathtrap a la, well, The Collector.
The multiple color and lighting schemes work together perfectly to make
this house of horrors seem like a nightmare-scape come to life. I could go on and on about the creep-out
paradise the majority of this flick takes place in, but there are only so many
ways I can espouse just how much ass it kicks.
The last time I dug a house in a horror flick this much was the House on
Horror Hill remake, and anyone who knows me can tell you how much I loved that
house. The set design is worth the
price of admission by itself.
If only a fraction of that excellence shown in the
production design had bled over into the screenplay. Man, this flick was poorly written. Not the dialog, but the actual story. There are plot holes that you could fit Tarantino’s ego through,
and leaps of logic that (insert today’s equivalent of Michael Jordan here since
I don’t know shit about sports) couldn’t pull off. The lack of attention to detail is amazing. Let me give you an example. This isn’t a spoiler, since we all saw that
cool “combine harvester blade in the nightclub” gimmick in the trailer. A character escapes becoming just more gore
on the dance floor (yes, that’s a Casket Creatures reference) by falling down. Yep, he falls down and the thing misses him
while it takes off everyone else’s head.
Obviously this contraption is moving from one end of the room to the
other at noggin level. Why did no one
else duck? Even the dumbest character
could put two and two together. If
you’re gonna have hundreds of people die by a single device in your flick,
don’t make said device so easily avoidable.
It raises too many believability questions. What if there were midgets getting down in there? The Collector seems like too thorough of a
guy to overlook a possibility like that.
I know that might seem like a nitpicky thing to point out,
but most of the REALLY big “what the hell is going on here” story gaffes are
major plot points, so I’m gonna leave those for you to facepalm at on your
own. The main offender throughout the
film is the character of Arkin. He
makes some decisions and does some stuff that contradicts things he did minutes
prior, are completely out of character for him, and downright make absolutely
no sense. He does have one shining
moment of brilliance. It’s a truly
novel bit, plus it leads to an extremely well executed moment of comic
relief. Most of the time, however, a
case could be made for the character being either schizophrenic or sub-Gump
level stupid. I wish I could explain
more, but I’m treading dangerously close to spoiler territory here.
All of the reviews I read before seeing the flick mentioned
the gore. In fact, they gushed about
the gore. I will say that there is
certainly a lot of the red stuff sprayed about. It was enough to make an old couple walk out five minutes into
the screening I was at. My cinematic
bloodlust, however, is unquenchable; and by this grue aficionado’s standards,
the gore was both awesome and awful.
The Collection excels at showing us the aftermath of the violence. The bodies we see are nice and meaty. The eponymous collection is a sight to
behold. The piles of nastiness in the
basement and the results of the club massacre are impressive. The wounds we see that have been inflicted
by knives and meathooks are pretty gnarly.
There are some nice slit throats.
The problem is, the actual moment of impact is almost always CGI…and we
don’t even get a good look at that.
One of the main things I loved about The Collector was the nasty
practical effects. There are a few good
ones in this flick, but the reliance on CGI for the big stuff is
disappointing. I think the scope of the
flick may have outpaced the budget in some ways, leading to all of the bad CGI
splatter. Had they let the club combine
chew through some physical heads instead of having actor’s craniums explode
into a cloud of animated red mist, that opening sequence might have been one of
the greatest cinematic bloodbaths of all time.
I weep for what could have been.
Another thing that ruins the violent moments is the way
they’re shot. For the majority of the
movie, the cinematography and camera work is pretty damn good. Then, when it’s time to get violent, the
camera starts shaking to the point that you can barely tell what’s going
on. I’m beginning to get a little
worried about this epidemic that seems to afflicting almost every cameraman
from Hollywood on down to the indies.
The condition, as far as I know, doesn’t have an official name, so I’m
gonna dub it ASSSSS. That stands for Action
Sequence Sudden Seizure Shaking Syndrome.
Melvin Van Peebles would definitely approve of that anagram. If you don’t get that reference, you’re
obviously a racist. Anyway, no one else
seems to even notice ASSSSS, so I’ll make ASSSSS awareness my cause. Do none of the rest of you care about these
poor cameramen? Is no one else
concerned? Can’t we organize a telethon
or something?
The acting is passable all around, with Emma Fitzpatrick
being the real standout. She is the
best “final girl” type heroine to come down the pike in some time. Far too often horror heroines are scared and
helpless and then suddenly shift into killer badass mode on a dime. That’s what we call “sloppy character
development” boys and girls. Thankfully,
Miss Fitzpatrick melds the two and avoids the “out of nowhere” character
shift. She gives us a believable
performance where she is determined to get out of her dire situation and is
willing to fight but always remembers to be scared shitless. It’s a very nuanced approach to the
archetype, and I’d be willing to bet that she spent some time studying Jamie
Lee’s Halloween performance in preparation for this role. Josh Stewart as Arkin and Randall Archer as
The Collector deliver, but the rest of the cast portrays characters that are so
one note or underdeveloped that it’s hard to really say much about their
effectiveness in the roles.
I think that the problem here is that Dunston and
Melton decided bigger was better, when it was the intimacy of The Collector
that made it work. The traps were
things that you could make in your basement.
That made it that much more chilling.
There is some of that here, but mainly The Collector is making things
that Jigsaw couldn’t even manage. The intense
one-on-one cat and mouse struggle between Arkin and The Collector in the first
movie is replaced here by a bunch of cookie cutter mercenaries going in Aliens
style. If you’re gonna do that, why not
get a bunch of washed up action stars to fill those roles and call it The
Collectibles? I’d go see that. All in all, The Collection is definitely a
step down from The Collector. Not
surprising from the writing team that ran the Saw franchise into the ground. That being said, The Collection is
definitely the grandest Guignol we’ve seen in American theaters in a
while. If you can turn your brain off,
there are some thrills to be had from some good gory set pieces, a classic
leading lady, and that phenomenal set.
There are also some sly giallo references for those paying attention, The
Argento Hotel being the most obvious.
Actually, go see it just for the hotel. It’s that cool. One severed thumb up. Nathan says check it out.